“Since the only difference in performance between the two is that the 7A handles better on the ground, and you can’t see the nose wheel (or tail wheel) while flying anyway …” (Van’s Air Force forum)
Have you built or flown any of these? Share your take in the comments below. And if you’re still Googling “fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better,” you’re on the right track – just buy the RV-7 plans and start cutting metal. fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
If you’ve spent any time scouring the FSX forums for the perfect general aviation (GA) fix, you’ve likely come across the BayTower Studio (BTS) Vans RV-7/7A . Released in 2012, this add-on remains a gold standard for authenticity and detail in Microsoft Flight Simulator X. But for virtual pilots, one question always remains: “Since the only difference in performance between the
What makes this comparison unique in FSX is how beautifully Bay Tower Studios modeled these distinct flight characteristics. The developer didn't just swap the visual models; the config files and aerodynamic behaviors are uniquely tuned. If you’ve spent any time scouring the FSX
The "A" in RV-7A denotes the tricycle gear configuration, featuring a free-castering nosewheel. Pros of the RV-7A
Tailwheel aircraft inherently handle rough, unpaved backcountry strips better because there is no fragile nose gear structure to damage on rocks or deep ruts.